Sunday May 19

Vandalism

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

Debate It!

If you damage property, you will be held accountable. If you recklessly damage property, it is called criminal damage. Criminal damages as defined by Arizona state law (A.R.S. 13-1602A&B) may be a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the amount of damage.In many cases you and your parents are responsible for paying for damages.

Defacing property is also considered criminal damages. This includes marking, scratching or painting of property that does not belong to you and without the owner's permission. Painting graffiti is breaking the law.

In Arizona, a 16-year old who spray-painted 32 homes, a half-dozen cars, and various garage doors and fences was tried as an adult and sentenced to 2 months in jail and 3 years probation. Juveniles who damage the property of others can be placed on probation (either with or without detention) and can be required to pay for damages.

 

< Prev   Next >
Debate It!
Become a legislator, a governor, a president, or a judge. The legislature can change the language of laws. The executive office can accept or veto those changes. If a case is brought before the court, a judge can rule that a law is constitutional or unconstitutional. Read the law above and then become part of the three branches.

Legislative Action




Keep this law Change this law

LC posted:
KEEP. Keep. in my opinion the defendent has destroyed/damaged the property of the other people and should be responsible to pay for the repairs.
Cleo posted:
KEEP. i believe that the law should be keeped not just beacuse the person just vandalized multipule places and items that did not belong to them, it just the fact that because they had repeated the act
James posted:
KEEP. My Ambition is to become a Barrister anyway enough about me. Vandalism is wrong and it's ruining communities, walking out of your door to see a telephone box destroyed or for a car, window.
+ Show More

Executive Action

The legislative branch voted that this law should be changed to read:

No child under 18 should ever be able to carry a weapon.
Do you want to accept of veto the new law?
Accept this law Veto this law

Judicial Action

The law has gone into effect. A case has been filed in court and claims that the new law is unconstitutional.

No child under 18 should ever be able to carry a weapon.
How do you rule?
Constitutional Unconstitutional

Share this page

FacebookMySpaceTwitterLinkedin

Visit Other States

Voting Poll

When was the last time you or your parents voted






Results

RSS Feed

Who's Online

We have 39 guests online